Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) vs MSI Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) does better (12) and where Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Graphics6.7
3.6Overall performance6.1
4.9Display4.0
2.8Memory & storage3.2
8.9Battery & portability3.9
7.5Features & cooling3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) | Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 259 mm | +10 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 25 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 54 Wh+68%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- CPU cores12 vs 8+50%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.25 kg+2%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 69%+45%
- Fan noise (max. load)39.4 dB vs 50 dB+27%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)10.9 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS+67%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,799 vs 12,396+59%
- GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 105 W+17%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Thickness26 mm vs 25 mm+4%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- DCI-P3 coverage40% vs 51%+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.9 TFLOPS | 18.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,799 | 12,396 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 12 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 69% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 51% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.25 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | 50 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)5.48.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)5.47.8vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.3vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMSI Sword 16 HX B14V RTX 4060 (2024)5.45.9vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.45.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)5.47.4