vs
4.2Graphics3.0
3.6Overall performance4.7
4.9Display5.1
2.8Memory & storage6.3
8.9Battery & portability2.4
7.5Features & cooling6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) | Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 277.9 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 397.5 mm | −43.5 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 30 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 3 kg | −0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)10.9 TFLOPS vs 6.4 TFLOPS+70%
- CPU cores12 vs 62×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024): No
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,799 vs 5,599+39%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.95 kg+34%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- Response time3 ms vs 7 ms2.3×
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024): No
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 2,560+20%
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- Advanced OptimusNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024): Yes
- Brightness250 nits vs 300 nits+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.9 TFLOPS | 6.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,799 | 5,599 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 12 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,027 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,856 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 769 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.95 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 397.5 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 277.9 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)5.48.1
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)5.47.8
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.3
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMSI Sword 16 HX B14V RTX 4060 (2024)5.45.9
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.45.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)5.47.4

