Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs MSI Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (5) and where Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Memory & storage9.8
7.8Battery & portability2.5
4.0Features & cooling2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) | Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 252 mm | 276 mm | −24 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 398 mm | −43 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 28 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 75 Wh+20%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.7 kg+19%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 250 GB2×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
Why is Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU cores6 vs 162.7×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Max CPU clock4.7 GHz vs 5.2 GHz+11%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | — |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.9 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,799 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 170 | Core i7-14650HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 250 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 8,000 GB | 8,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 250 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 252 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | — |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 B13 RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.5vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 17 B13W RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)6.07.8vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)6.08.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.4