Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (9) and where Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Memory & storage2.4
8.9Battery & portability5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 247 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 361 mm | −7 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 24 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 53 Wh+70%
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.25 kg+2%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Erazer Deputy 15 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Thickness26 mm vs 24 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,947 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Core 7 250H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | — |
| Response time | 11 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.25 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 361 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 247 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)8.18.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 RTX 5060 (2025)8.18.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.1
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector A16 HX A8W RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)5.48.1