vs
7.7Graphics7.4
7.8Overall performance4.4
6.6Display6.2
4.4Memory & storage4.9
8.9Battery & portability5.8
7.5Features & cooling3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4070 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) | LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 258.7 mm | +10.3 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359.9 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 23.9 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,288 vs 6,4272.1×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 60 Wh+50%
- CPU cores8 vs 42×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core931 vs 484+92%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS+31%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.38 kg+8%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,947 vs 13,831+8%
- CPU threads16 vs 82×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
Why is LOQ 15ARP9 RTX 4070 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- DCI-P3 coverage40% vs 78%+95%
- Thickness26 mm vs 23.9 mm+9%
- sRGB coverage60% vs 100%+67%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,947 | 13,831 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen 5 7235HS, Ryzen 7 7435HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | 6,427 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | 1,827 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | 484 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | 100% |
| Response time | 11 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 78% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.38 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 23.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359.9 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 258.7 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)8.18.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 RTX 5060 (2025)8.18.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.1
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector A16 HX A8W RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)5.48.1