Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (16) and where Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Graphics8.3
7.8Overall performance7.2
6.6Display8.1
4.4Memory & storage6.3
8.9Battery & portability3.9
7.5Features & cooling5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 261.8 mm | +7.2 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 363.4 mm | −9.4 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 26.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.5 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,288 vs 10,326+29%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+20%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.5 kg+14%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,947 vs 14,469+3%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core931 vs 889+5%
- Thickness26 mm vs 26.9 mm+3%
Why is Legion Pro 5i Gen 9 RTX 4070 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 140 W+22%
- Response time11 ms vs 3 ms3.7×
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- HDRNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- USB-A ports2 vs 42×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- DCI-P3 coverage40% vs 69%+73%
- sRGB coverage60% vs 100%+67%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 189 ppi+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,947 | 14,469 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Core i5-14450HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | Core i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | 10,326 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | 2,299 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | 889 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | 100% |
| Response time | 11 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 69% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 300 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 26.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 363.4 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 261.8 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | 56.6 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)8.18.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 RTX 5060 (2025)8.18.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.1
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector A16 HX A8W RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)5.48.1