Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (11) and where Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025) wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Graphics5.6
7.8Overall performance7.7
6.6Display9.4
4.4Memory & storage4.9
8.9Battery & portability6.6
7.5Features & cooling7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 268.1 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 364.4 mm | −10.4 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 25.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 14.9 TFLOPS+76%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,947 vs 9,851+52%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.3 kg+5%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Fan noise (max. load)39.4 dB vs 56 dB+42%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 RTX 5050 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core931 vs 1,671+79%
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,288 vs 15,923+20%
- Response time11 ms vs 1 ms11×
- DCI-P3 coverage40% vs 100%2.5×
- CPU threads16 vs 322×
- HDRNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- sRGB coverage60% vs 100%+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,947 | 9,851 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 8945HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | 15,923 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | 2,794 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | 1,671 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | 100% |
| Response time | 11 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 25.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 364.4 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 268.1 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | 56 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)8.18.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 RTX 5060 (2025)8.18.0
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.1
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector A16 HX A8W RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)5.48.1