Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) vs MSI Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)
What TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) does better (14) and where Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Graphics6.7
7.3Overall performance6.1
5.4Display4.0
2.8Memory & storage3.2
9.0Battery & portability3.9
6.4Features & cooling3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) | Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 251 mm | 259 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 25 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 54 Wh+68%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 105 W+33%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- GPU compute (FP32)21.8 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS+20%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,738 vs 12,396+11%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.25 kg+2%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Brightness300 nits vs 250 nits+20%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 69%+45%
- DCI-P3 coverage70% vs 51%+37%
Why is Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Response time27 ms vs 3 ms9×
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | 18.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,738 | 12,396 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 69% |
| Response time | 27 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 70% | 51% |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.25 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 251 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 46 dB | 50 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.67.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.66.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.67.5
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.77.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.67.5
vsAcer Nitro 16 Intel AN16-73 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.67.6