Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) vs Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)
What TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) does better (5) and where Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Memory & storage2.3
9.0Battery & portability8.8
6.4Features & cooling3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)
| TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) | Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 251 mm | 262 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 395 mm | −41 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021): No
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.3 kg+5%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- Thickness25 mm vs 26 mm+4%
- Max CPU clock5.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz+16%
Why is Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3070 (2021) better than TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SD card readerNo · TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024): Yes
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,120+11%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 17.3″+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,120 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,738 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 27 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 70% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 91 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 251 mm | 262 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 46 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.67.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.67.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.67.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.66.1
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.87.6
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.47.6