Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) does better (5) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Graphics7.7
7.3Overall performance7.6
5.3Display6.6
2.9Memory & storage3.3
9.0Battery & portability8.9
6.4Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) | TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 251 mm | 269 mm | −18 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 354 mm | = |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 115 W+22%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- DCI-P3 coverage70% vs 40%+75%
- Thickness25 mm vs 26 mm+4%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 60%+67%
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU compute (FP32)21.8 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS+20%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,738 vs 14,947+9%
- Response time27 ms vs 11 ms2.5×
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)46 dB vs 39.4 dB+17%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 16″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,738 | 14,947 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8945H | Ryzen 7 260 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 13,288 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,651 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 931 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 60% |
| Response time | 27 ms | 11 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 70% | 40% |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 251 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 46 dB | 39.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.67.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.67.4vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.67.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)7.66.1
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.87.6
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.47.6