vs
9.4Graphics8.1
8.8Overall performance8.4
9.3Display8.2
8.6Memory & storage8.6
9.3Battery & portability9.5
9.2Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)Raider GE67 RTX 3070 Ti (2022)
| ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023) | Raider GE67 RTX 3070 Ti (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 267 mm | −21 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 358 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 23.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Raider GE67 RTX 3070 Ti (2022)?
- GPU compute (FP32)39.7 TFLOPS vs 18.5 TFLOPS2.1×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light24,294 vs 12,584+93%
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 5,632+73%
- Brightness500 nits vs 350 nits+43%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core15,617 vs 14,416+8%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.38 kg+3%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Raider GE67 RTX 3070 Ti (2022): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Raider GE67 RTX 3070 Ti (2022): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Raider GE67 RTX 3070 Ti (2022): No
- Thickness22.9 mm vs 23.4 mm+2%
Why is Raider GE67 RTX 3070 Ti (2022) better than ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core754 vs 1,153+53%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- CPU threads20 vs 24+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 150 W | 150 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 5,632 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 39.7 TFLOPS | 18.5 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 24,294 | 12,584 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900H | Core i7-12800HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900H | Core i7-12800HX, Core i9-12900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 15,617 | 14,416 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,821 | 2,538 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 754 | 1,153 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 350 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 90% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 72% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.38 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 23.4 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 358 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 267 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Gray, Blue |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.5 dB | 57.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023)9.69.5vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023)9.69.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion 9i Gen 8 RTX 4080 (2023)9.69.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion 9i Gen 8 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4090 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6