Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)
What ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023) does better (9) and where Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Graphics9.8
8.6Overall performance9.7
9.3Display9.7
7.1Memory & storage7.1
9.2Battery & portability5.7
8.4Features & cooling9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)
| ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023) | Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 276 mm | −30 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 364 mm | −9 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 27 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023) better than Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.72 kg+18%
- RAM (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Thickness23 mm vs 27 mm+17%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)33.9 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+52%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light21,090 vs 31,227+48%
- Video memory12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- GPU power (TGP)150 W vs 175 W+17%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- CPU cores14 vs 24+71%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- GPU shader cores7,424 vs 10,496+41%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023): Yes
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 150 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,424 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 33.9 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 21,090 | 31,227 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900H | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900H | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 15,617 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,821 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 754 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.72 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 364 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.5 dB | 53.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.4vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.5vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023)9.49.5vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)9.49.2
vsAcer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)9.69.4vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.6