Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (8) and where Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Graphics8.9
8.3Overall performance9.0
9.2Display9.6
8.7Memory & storage6.7
9.3Battery & portability5.7
9.2Features & cooling9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 276 mm | −30 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 364 mm | −9 mm |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 27 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.72 kg+18%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Thickness22.9 mm vs 27 mm+18%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,883 vs 21,669+56%
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- GPU compute (FP32)21.8 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+43%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,883 | 21,669 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900H | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900H | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 15,617 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,821 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 754 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.72 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 364 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.5 dB | 53.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.5vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.4vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.5vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4070 (2023)9.49.5
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.29.4