Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) vs HP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
What ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) does better (11) and where Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Graphics8.4
7.7Overall performance9.1
5.8Display4.7
7.7Memory & storage6.4
7.0Battery & portability7.3
5.0Features & cooling5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
| ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) | Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 243 mm | 269 mm | −26 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 356.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.1 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) better than Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)48 GB vs 32 GB+50%
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- GPU shader cores7,424 vs 4,608+61%
- Weight1.9 kg vs 2.09 kg+10%
- Response time3 ms vs 7 ms2.3×
- HDRYes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- USB-A ports2 vs 12×
- SD card readerYes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Max. supported RAM48 GB vs 32 GB+50%
Why is Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)?
- GPU power (TGP)120 W vs 130 W+8%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 97 Wh+8%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core11,387 vs 14,310+26%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,005 vs 13,037+9%
- GPU compute (FP32)20.7 TFLOPS vs 21.2 TFLOPS+2%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,078 vs 1,317+22%
- HDMI 2.1No · ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022): Yes
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- CPU threads20 vs 24+20%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
- Fan noise (max. load)52 dB vs 47 dB+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 120 W | 130 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,424 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 20.7 TFLOPS | 21.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,005 | 13,037 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-12700H | Core i7-13700HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-12700H, Core i9-12900H | Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,387 | 14,310 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,380 | 2,578 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,078 | 1,317 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 7 ms |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 1 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 97 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.09 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.8 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 356.6 mm |
| Depth | 243 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52 dB | 47 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4.2 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)vsAlienware x17 R2 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)8.58.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)vsAlienware x17 R2 RTX 3080 (2022)8.58.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)vsAlienware x15 R2 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)8.58.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)vsMSI Stealth GS66 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)8.58.5vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)vsLenovo Legion 7i Gen 7 Intel RTX 3080 Ti (2022)8.58.5
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)8.58.5