NewMSI Katana 15 HX C14W RTX 5060 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026) vs Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026) vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)

What ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026) does better (16) and where Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026) wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026)
9.7Score
16 advantages≈ $6,500
Higher score
vs
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $4,700
9.8Graphics7.1
9.8Overall performance8.2
9.7Display9.2
7.3Memory & storage6.9
9.6Battery & portability9.1
9.3Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026)Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)
354 × 24616347 × 24217
ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026)Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)Difference
Depth246 mm242 mm+4 mm
Width354 mm347 mm+7 mm
Thickness16 mm17 mm−1 mm
Weight1.8 kg1.6 kg+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026) better than Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026)?

  1. GPU power (TGP)160 W vs 85 W+88%
  2. GPU compute (FP32)47.7 TFLOPS vs 20.1 TFLOPS2.4×
  3. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light27,336 vs 12,7382.1×
  4. Video memory24 GB vs 8 GB3×
  5. GPU shader cores10,496 vs 4,6082.3×
  6. Brightness1,100 nits vs 500 nits2.2×
  7. SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
  8. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
  9. Battery capacity90 Wh vs 84 Wh+7%
  10. SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
  11. Vapor chamber coolingYes · Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026): No
  12. Thickness16 mm vs 17 mm+6%

Why is Yoga Pro 7 15 G11 RTX 5070 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5090 (2026)?

  1. Weight1.85 kg vs 1.65 kg+12%
  2. Pixel density189 ppi vs 197 ppi+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)160 W85 W
Video memory24 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
GPU shader cores10,4964,608
GPU compute (FP32)47.7 TFLOPS20.1 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light27,33612,738
Processor
ProcessorCore Ultra 9 386HCore Ultra 9 386H
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores1616
CPU threads16—
Max CPU clock4.9 GHz4.9 GHz
Processor optionsCore Ultra 9 386HCore Ultra 7 356H, Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 multi-core17,034—
Geekbench 6 single-core2,885—
Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,274—
Display
Screen size16″15.3″
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz165 Hz
Panel typeOLEDOLED
Brightness1,100 nits500 nits
sRGB coverage100%100%
Response time1 ms1 ms
DCI-P3 coverage100%100%
Pixel density189 ppi197 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesYes
Advanced OptimusNo—
MUX switchYes—
HDRYesYes
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)64 GB64 GB
RAM (base)64 GB64 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5XLPDDR5X
RAM speed8,533 MHz8,533 MHz
Upgradable RAMNoNo
SSD (up to)2,000 GB1,000 GB
SSD (base)2,000 GB1,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh84 Wh
Power adapter250 W140 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
USB-C charging power—100 W
Design & cooling
Weight1.85 kg1.65 kg
Thickness16 mm17 mm
Width354 mm347 mm
Depth246 mm242 mm
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
ColoursGreyGrey
Cooling fans32
Vapor chamber coolingYesNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)54.8 dB54.4 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports22
USB-A ports22
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerYesYes
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadNoNo
Key travel1.7 mm1.5 mm
Webcam1,080p—
IR camera (face login)YesYes
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers4 speakers4 speakers
Dolby AtmosYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare