Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) vs Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026)
What ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) does better (22) and where Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Graphics8.7
9.3Overall performance9.0
9.7Display9.2
4.0Memory & storage9.2
9.6Battery & portability4.6
9.3Features & cooling7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026)
| ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 244.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 344 mm | +10 mm |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 19.9 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 1.9 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026)?
- Brightness1,100 nits vs 500 nits2.2×
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light18,998 vs 13,371+42%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core17,034 vs 15,924+7%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS+2%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 4,608+28%
- Thickness16 mm vs 19.9 mm+24%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026): No
- SD card readerYes · Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026): No
Why is Legion 5i Gen 11 RTX 5070 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- Upgradable RAMNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): Yes
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- Fan noise (max. load)54.8 dB vs 51.9 dB+6%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 197 ppi+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 18,998 | 13,371 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 7 356H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 7 251HX, Core Ultra 7 356H, Core Ultra 9 386H, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 17,034 | 15,924 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,885 | 2,724 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,274 | 1,128 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 197 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 250 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.85 kg | 1.87 kg |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 19.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 344 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 244.5 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | White | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54.8 dB | 51.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2026)9.49.6
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)9.39.4
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.79.4
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.69.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5090 (2026)9.49.5vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5070 Ti (2026)9.49.4