NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024)

What ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (21) and where Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025)
9.5Score
21 advantages≈ $5,000
Higher score
vs
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024)
8.9Score
6 advantages
9.5Graphics8.3
9.4Overall performance7.9
9.5Display8.6
5.0Memory & storage7.6
9.0Battery & portability6.1
9.0Features & cooling7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025)Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024)
354 × 24617319.7 × 22016.8
ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025)Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024)Difference
Depth246 mm220 mm+26 mm
Width354 mm319.7 mm+34.3 mm
Thickness17 mm16.8 mm+0.2 mm
Weight2 kg1.8 kg+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024)?

  1. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light24,671 vs 12,382+99%
  2. Video memory24 GB vs 8 GB3×
  3. GPU compute (FP32)37.9 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+74%
  4. GPU shader cores10,496 vs 4,6082.3×
  5. Battery capacity90 Wh vs 68 Wh+32%
  6. CPU cores16 vs 82×
  7. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  8. SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+95%
  9. Response time1 ms vs 3 ms3×
  10. RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  11. RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
  12. M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×

Why is Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025)?

  1. RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
  2. GPU power (TGP)120 W vs 140 W+17%
  3. Weight1.95 kg vs 1.78 kg+10%
  4. Upgradable RAMNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
  5. Fan noise (max. load)68 dB vs 51.9 dB+31%
  6. Pixel density189 ppi vs 216 ppi+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)120 W140 W
Video memory24 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
GPU shader cores10,4964,608
GPU compute (FP32)37.9 TFLOPS21.8 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light24,67112,382
Processor
ProcessorCore Ultra 9 285HRyzen 7 8845HS
CPU makerIntelAMD
CPU cores168
CPU threads—16
Max CPU clock5.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Processor optionsCore i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 9 285HRyzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS
Geekbench 6 multi-core—12,724
Geekbench 6 single-core—2,540
Cinebench 2024 multi-core—918
Display
Screen size16″14″
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Brightness500 nits500 nits
sRGB coverage100%100%
Response time1 ms3 ms
DCI-P3 coverage100%100%
Pixel density189 ppi216 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesYes
Advanced OptimusNoNo
MUX switchYesYes
HDRYesYes
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB96 GB
RAM (base)32 GB16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5XDDR5
RAM speed7,467 MHz5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM—96 GB
RAM slots—2
Upgradable RAMNoYes
SSD (up to)2,000 GB1,024 GB
SSD (base)2,000 GB1,024 GB
M.2 SSD slots21
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh68 Wh
Power adapter240 W230 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
Design & cooling
Weight1.95 kg1.78 kg
Thickness17 mm16.8 mm
Width354 mm319.7 mm
Depth246 mm220 mm
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
ColoursGreyWhite, Black
Cooling fans32
Vapor chamber coolingYesYes
Liquid metal (CPU)YesNo
Fan noise (max. load)68 dB51.9 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4USB4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports22
USB-A ports22
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet portYesNo
SD card readerYesNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadNoNo
Key travel1.7 mm1 mm
Webcam1,080p1,080p
IR camera (face login)YesYes
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers4 speakers2.0
Dolby AtmosYesNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare