Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024)
What ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (16) and where Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Graphics9.1
9.2Overall performance9.2
9.5Display7.1
5.2Memory & storage9.7
9.0Battery & portability8.3
9.0Features & cooling7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024)
| ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 259.7 mm | −13.7 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 355.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 19.9 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024)?
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 105 W+10%
- Weight1.95 kg vs 1.99 kg+2%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024): No
- HDRYes · Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024): No
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024): No
- USB-A ports2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024): No
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+95%
Why is Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 9,728+65%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+16%
- Video memory12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Upgradable RAMNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,115 | 19,786 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 285H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | — | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 9 285H | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,864 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,489 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 969 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 1 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.95 kg | 1.99 kg |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 19.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 355.8 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 259.7 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Grey | Blue |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 68 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.89.4
vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.39.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 5070 (2025)9.49.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.49.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.49.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.49.5