vs
9.3Graphics9.4
8.6Overall performance8.7
7.2Display9.3
6.9Memory & storage9.5
9.3Battery & portability7.4
9.4Features & cooling7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024)Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024) | Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 250.5 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359.8 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Thickness | 17.2 mm | 17.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 2.1 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024) better than Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 5,888+65%
- Weight1.85 kg vs 2.1 kg+14%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core961 vs 913+5%
- Cooling fans3 vs 2+50%
- CPU threads22 vs 16+38%
- Fan noise (max. load)46.4 dB vs 53.4 dB+15%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 140 W+22%
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB2×
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,605 vs 13,856+10%
- HDRNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,455 vs 2,928+19%
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 8,000 MHz+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 19,706 | 19,614 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,605 | 13,856 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,455 | 2,928 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 961 | 913 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 8,000 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.85 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 17.2 mm | 17.4 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359.8 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 250.5 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | White, Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 46.4 dB | 53.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 4.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4080 (2024)9.39.4vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4090 (2024)9.39.5vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024)vsAlienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)9.39.0vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4070 (2024)9.39.0
vs
Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5080 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.29.5
vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.69.5