Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024) vs Samsung Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2024)
What ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024) does better (3) and where Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2024) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display7.2
4.2Memory & storage8.1
8.8Battery & portability7.9
8.1Features & cooling5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2024)
| ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024) | Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 250 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 350 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 16 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 1.9 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 76 Wh+18%
- Brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
Why is Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2024) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Weight2 kg vs 1.86 kg+8%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thickness17 mm vs 16 mm+6%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,238 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 22 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,605 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,455 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 961 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 1.86 kg |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 16 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 350 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 250 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Grey | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 3 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 46.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5060 (2025)8.48.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5090 (2025)8.49.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5080 (2025)8.49.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024)8.48.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAlienware x16 R2 RTX 4070 (2024)8.48.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4070 (2024)vsMSI Creator A16 AI+ RTX 4070 (2024)8.48.8