Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024) vs Lenovo Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
What ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024) does better (11) and where Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Graphics7.2
6.5Overall performance7.0
7.2Display9.5
6.9Memory & storage4.0
9.3Battery & portability5.2
9.4Features & cooling8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024)Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
| ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024) | Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 250 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 362 mm | −8 mm |
| Thickness | 17.2 mm | 20 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 84 Wh+7%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- Thickness17.2 mm vs 20 mm+16%
- Cooling fans3 vs 2+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)46.4 dB vs 53 dB+14%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.6 mm+6%
Why is Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)12.3 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+50%
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- GPU power (TGP)100 W vs 115 W+15%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,320 vs 11,788+26%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Weight1.85 kg vs 1.8 kg+3%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024): Yes
- HDRNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 3,328+8%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 100 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.3 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,320 | 11,788 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 22 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen AI 7 450, Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,605 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,455 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 961 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 84 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.85 kg | 1.8 kg |
| Thickness | 17.2 mm | 20 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 362 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 250 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | White, Gray | White |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 46.4 dB | 53 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.77.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAlienware x16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.77.8vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024)vsLenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4070 (2024)7.77.8vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMSI Creator A16 AI+ RTX 4060 (2024)7.78.0
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4060 (2024)7.87.7
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-I51 RTX 5070 (2026)vsLenovo Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)8.27.9