Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025)
What ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (14) and where Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Graphics8.8
7.7Overall performance9.5
7.9Display9.0
4.0Memory & storage6.4
9.6Battery & portability6.3
9.7Features & cooling7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025)
| ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025) | Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 263.4 mm | −17.4 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 361.7 mm | −7.7 mm |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 17.9 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 2 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 84 Wh+7%
- Response time0.2 ms vs 1 ms5×
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Weight1.85 kg vs 2 kg+8%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Thickness16 mm vs 17.9 mm+12%
- Cooling fans3 vs 2+50%
Why is Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- CPU cores8 vs 202.5×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core895 vs 1,774+98%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,586 vs 18,468+36%
- GPU power (TGP)105 W vs 115 W+10%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- GPU compute (FP32)24.2 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS+8%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- HDRNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Upgradable RAMNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 24.2 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,148 | 14,353 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core Ultra 7 255HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 20 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,586 | 18,468 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,864 | 2,919 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 895 | 1,774 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 0.2 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,500 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 84 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.85 kg | 2 kg |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 17.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 361.7 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 263.4 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Grey | White |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 54.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3 RTX 5080 (2025)8.88.6
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)8.88.8vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Swift X 14 SFX14-73 RTX 5070 (2025)8.89.0
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)7.18.8
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.8
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5060 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5070 (2025)8.48.8