Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025) vs HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
What ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (18) and where Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Graphics3.5
7.0Overall performance5.4
7.9Display8.4
2.5Memory & storage2.2
9.6Battery & portability5.2
9.7Features & cooling7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
| ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025) | Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 234 mm | +12 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 313 mm | +41 mm |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 18 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU power (TGP)105 W vs 65 W+62%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- GPU compute (FP32)17.2 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS+61%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 71 Wh+27%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,170 vs 7,977+53%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,586 vs 12,402+10%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Thickness16 mm vs 18 mm+12%
Why is Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Weight1.85 kg vs 1.75 kg+6%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- HDRNo · ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core895 vs 942+5%
- CPU threads16 vs 22+38%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 243 ppi+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | 65 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 17.2 TFLOPS | 10.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,170 | 7,977 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,586 | 12,402 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,864 | 2,385 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 895 | 942 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 0.2 ms | 0.2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 7,500 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.85 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 313 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 234 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | White | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 51.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)8.28.0vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7a 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)8.07.9vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i 16 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)8.08.0vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)8.08.1
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)7.18.0
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)6.08.0