Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) vs MSI Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024)
What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) does better (14) and where Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics9.3
9.4Overall performance9.1
9.3Display7.5
5.3Memory & storage4.5
3.6Battery & portability4.9
6.4Features & cooling8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024)
| ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 298 mm | −32 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 380 mm | −25 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 24 mm | +6 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 3 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024)?
- Brightness1,100 nits vs 300 nits3.7×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,424 vs 21,600+22%
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 37.6 TFLOPS+20%
- Weight2.67 kg vs 3 kg+12%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 7,424+31%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024): No
- HDRYes · Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024): No
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024): No
Why is Vector 17 HX A14V RTX 4080 (2024) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- Thickness30 mm vs 24 mm+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- USB-C ports2 vs 3+50%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
- Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 37.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,424 | 21,600 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 32 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i9-13980HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,038 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,105 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,961 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 133 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.67 kg | 3 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 380 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 298 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Alpha 17 RTX 4060 (2023)8.98.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 3080 Ti (2023)8.98.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.98.6
vsAcer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.78.9