Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) vs MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026)
What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) does better (5) and where Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026) wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics9.7
9.4Overall performance9.3
9.3Display9.5
5.3Memory & storage5.5
3.6Battery & portability5.3
6.4Features & cooling9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026)
| ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 270 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 363 mm | −8 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 29 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.6 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- Brightness1,100 nits vs 500 nits2.2×
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026): No
- Fan noise (max. load)56 dB vs 60.2 dB+7%
Why is Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+14%
- Video memory16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,424 vs 28,614+8%
- Weight2.67 kg vs 2.6 kg+3%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- IR camera (face login)No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 10,496+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,424 | 28,614 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 32 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,038 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,105 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,961 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 92 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.67 kg | 2.6 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 29 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 363 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 270 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | 60.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Per-key RGB |
| Per-key RGB | — | Yes |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Alpha 17 RTX 4060 (2023)8.98.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 3080 Ti (2023)8.98.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.98.6
vsAcer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.78.9