Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) vs HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) does better (10) and where Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics9.8
9.4Overall performance9.7
9.3Display8.9
5.3Memory & storage6.6
3.6Battery & portability5.9
6.4Features & cooling8.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
| ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 269 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 357 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 23 mm | +7 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.7 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Brightness1,100 nits vs 500 nits2.2×
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- HDRYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- SD card readerYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 142 ppi+33%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
- Fan noise (max. load)56 dB vs 61.1 dB+9%
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,424 vs 31,120+18%
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+14%
- Video memory16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- Thickness30 mm vs 23 mm+30%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 10,496+8%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,424 | 31,120 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 32 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,038 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,105 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,961 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.67 kg | 2.68 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | 61.1 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Alpha 17 RTX 4060 (2023)8.98.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 3080 Ti (2023)8.98.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.98.6
vsAcer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.78.9