Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) vs Gigabyte Aero 16 OLED RTX 4070 (2023)
What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) does better (20) and where Aero 16 OLED RTX 4070 (2023) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics6.8
9.4Overall performance7.4
9.3Display8.7
5.3Memory & storage7.4
3.6Battery & portability9.6
6.4Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)Aero 16 OLED RTX 4070 (2023)
| ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | Aero 16 OLED RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 255 mm | +11 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 354 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 22 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.1 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Aero 16 OLED RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 60 Hz4×
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS2.5×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,424 vs 12,5752.1×
- GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 105 W+67%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,961 vs 7802.5×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,038 vs 12,218+56%
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 4,6082.1×
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Brightness1,100 nits vs 600 nits+83%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 88 Wh+2%
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 256 GB7.8×
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Aero 16 OLED RTX 4070 (2023): No
Why is Aero 16 OLED RTX 4070 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Weight2.67 kg vs 2.1 kg+27%
- Thickness30 mm vs 22 mm+36%
- IR camera (face login)No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 2,048 GB+2%
- Response time3 ms vs 2 ms+50%
- USB-C ports2 vs 3+50%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 283 ppi+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 18.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,424 | 12,575 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i7-13700H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i7-13700H, Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,038 | 12,218 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,105 | 2,638 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,961 | 780 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3840 × 2400 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 4K (2160p/2400p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | 600 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 283 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 256 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 88 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.67 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 22 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 255 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | 55.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)8.99.2vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.98.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Alpha 17 RTX 4060 (2023)8.98.6
vsAcer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.68.9vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.2vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3