Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026) vs HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026)
What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026) does better (10) and where Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Graphics9.8
9.0Overall performance9.4
9.0Display9.4
8.0Memory & storage8.6
4.9Battery & portability2.4
9.7Features & cooling9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026)
| ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026) | Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 246 mm | 269 mm | −23 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 356.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 24.9 mm | 28.7 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 3 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- Weight2.82 kg vs 3 kg+6%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- SD card readerYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026): No
- Thickness24.9 mm vs 28.7 mm+15%
- RAM speed8,533 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+52%
- Fan noise (max. load)54.1 dB vs 61.8 dB+14%
- Pixel density212 ppi vs 189 ppi+12%
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- GPU power (TGP)135 W vs 175 W+30%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- GPU compute (FP32)41.6 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+24%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,964 vs 30,836+14%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,283 vs 1,752+37%
- CPU cores16 vs 20+25%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026): Yes
- Upgradable RAMNo · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026): Yes
- Liquid metal (CPU)No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026): Yes
- CPU threads16 vs 20+25%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 5.3 GHz+8%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,952 vs 3,178+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 135 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 41.6 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,964 | 30,836 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 20 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 386H | Ryzen AI 7 450, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 17,133 | 17,190 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,952 | 3,178 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,283 | 1,752 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 212 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 250 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.82 kg | 3 kg |
| Thickness | 24.9 mm | 28.7 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 356.5 mm |
| Depth | 246 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Gray | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54.1 dB | 61.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)9.49.5vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)9.49.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 HX AI RTX 5090 (2026)9.49.6
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.49.2vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.49.4vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)9.49.4