vs
9.2Memory & storage4.3
4.4Battery & portability6.0
9.1Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
| ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) | Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 260 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 28 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.6 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) better than Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.65 kg+6%
- RAM (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)4,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
- Max CPU clock5.6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+4%
Why is Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)?
- Video memory12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- GPU shader cores7,424 vs 10,496+41%
- Thickness30 mm vs 28 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,424 | 10,496 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | — | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 4,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.65 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 260 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)7.98.0
vs
Alienware m16 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)7.98.0
vs
Gigabyte Aorus 15 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.38.0
vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)7.98.0
vs
MSI Vector GP78 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.08.0
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.28.0

