Asus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) vs Medion Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)
What ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) does better (4) and where Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Memory & storage7.1
4.4Battery & portability8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)
| ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) | Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 262 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 395 mm | −41 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 26 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023) better than Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)?
- SSD (up to)4,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- CPU cores24 vs 14+71%
- SSD (base)4,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Max CPU clock5.6 GHz vs 5 GHz+12%
Why is Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) better than ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)?
- Video memory12 GB vs 64 GB5.3×
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.3 kg+9%
- Thickness30 mm vs 26 mm+15%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 64 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 7,424 | 7,424 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-12900HK |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 14 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.6 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 4,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 91 Wh |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 262 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)7.98.0
vs
Alienware m16 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)7.98.0
vs
Gigabyte Aorus 15 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.38.0
vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)7.98.0
vs
MSI Vector GP78 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.08.0
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar G16 G634 RTX 4080 (2023)8.28.0

