Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026) vs Lenovo Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)
What ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026) does better (11) and where Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Graphics9.1
9.6Overall performance8.6
9.2Display9.3
8.8Memory & storage5.9
2.1Battery & portability7.9
7.3Features & cooling9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)
| ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026) | Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 298 mm | 297 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 399 mm | 403 mm | −4 mm |
| Thickness | 35 mm | 28 mm | +7 mm |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 3.5 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026) better than Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- SSD (up to)8,192 GB vs 2,000 GB4.1×
- Brightness1,200 nits vs 540 nits2.2×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core24,014 vs 22,129+9%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core2,717 vs 2,079+31%
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Key travel2 mm vs 1.6 mm+25%
- RAM speed6,403 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
- DCI-P3 coverage100% vs 89%+12%
- Geekbench 6 single-core3,559 vs 3,236+10%
- Fan noise (max. load)54 dB vs 56 dB+4%
Why is Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)?
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- GPU compute (FP32)42 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+22%
- Video memory16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light28,773 vs 30,865+7%
- Weight3.7 kg vs 3.5 kg+6%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 10,496+37%
- Thickness35 mm vs 28 mm+25%
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 42×
- SD card readerNo · ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026): Yes
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 2,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 42 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 28,773 | 30,865 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 24,014 | 22,129 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,559 | 3,236 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 2,717 | 2,079 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3840 × 2400 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 4K (2160p/2400p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 1,200 nits | 540 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 89% |
| Pixel density | 168 ppi | 252 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,403 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 4 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 8,192 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 4 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 3.5 kg |
| Thickness | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 399 mm | 403 mm |
| Depth | 298 mm | 297 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 4 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 56 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.2 | 6 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)9.08.9
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)7.68.9
vs
Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5090 (2026)8.99.2
vs
Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)vsRazer Blade 18 RTX 5090 (2026)8.99.0
vs
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-I71 RTX 5090 (2026)vsAsus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)9.48.9
vs
Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835 RTX 5080 (2026)vsRazer Blade 18 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.99.0

