Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) vs MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025)
What ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (17) and where Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics9.4
9.7Overall performance9.5
9.6Display4.4
6.6Memory & storage9.5
3.1Battery & portability3.8
9.7Features & cooling9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025)
| ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) | Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 268 mm | 284 mm | −16 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 31 mm | 28.6 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.7 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel typeMini-LED vs IPS
- GPU compute (FP32)51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS+22%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light29,079 vs 24,343+19%
- Video memory24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 7,680+37%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025): No
- HDRYes · Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025): No
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025): No
- CPU cores24 vs 20+20%
Why is Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.7 kg+4%
- SD card readerNo · ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- Thickness31 mm vs 28.6 mm+8%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- USB-C charging power100 W vs 140 W+40%
- Fan noise (max. load)57.2 dB vs 49 dB+17%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 51.4 TFLOPS | 42 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 29,079 | 24,343 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 20 |
| CPU threads | — | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 285HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 19,073 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,991 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 1,837 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | IPS |
| Brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 380 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 31 mm | 28.6 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 268 mm | 284 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.2 dB | 49 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)9.59.5vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.4vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.59.4vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.6
vsAcer Predator Helios 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)9.49.5
vsAsus ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634 RTX 4080 (2024)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.5