NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) vs MSI Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025)

What ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (26) and where Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)
9.5Score
26 advantages≈ $4,900
Higher score
vs
MSI Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025)
7.7Score
5 advantages
9.7Graphics7.0
9.7Overall performance8.5
9.6Display4.6
6.6Memory & storage7.9
3.1Battery & portability4.9
9.7Features & cooling4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025)
354 × 26831359 × 26225.5
ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025)Difference
Depth268 mm262 mm+6 mm
Width354 mm359 mm−5 mm
Thickness31 mm25.5 mm+5.5 mm
Weight2.8 kg2.4 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025)?

  1. GPU compute (FP32)51.4 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS2.8×
  2. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light29,079 vs 12,9722.2×
  3. GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 115 W+52%
  4. Video memory24 GB vs 8 GB3×
  5. GPU shader cores10,496 vs 3,3283.2×
  6. Brightness1,200 nits vs 300 nits4×
  7. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
  8. Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
  9. Panel typeMini-LED vs IPS
  10. Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025): No
  11. Battery capacity90 Wh vs 75 Wh+20%
  12. CPU cores24 vs 16+50%

Why is Katana 15 RTX 5060 (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)?

  1. RAM (up to)64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
  2. SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
  3. Weight2.8 kg vs 2.4 kg+17%
  4. Thickness31 mm vs 25.5 mm+22%
  5. Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)175 W115 W
Video memory24 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
GPU shader cores10,4963,328
GPU compute (FP32)51.4 TFLOPS18.4 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light29,07912,972
Processor
ProcessorCore Ultra 9 275HXCore i7-14650HX
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores2416
CPU threads—24
Max CPU clock5.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Processor optionsCore Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HXCore i7-14650HX, Core i9-14900HX
Geekbench 6 multi-core—15,920
Geekbench 6 single-core—2,738
Cinebench 2024 multi-core—1,071
Display
Screen size16″15.6″
Resolution2560 × 16001920 × 1080
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate240 Hz144 Hz
Panel typeMini-LEDIPS
Brightness1,200 nits300 nits
sRGB coverage100%—
Response time3 ms—
DCI-P3 coverage100%—
Pixel density189 ppi141 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
G-Sync / FreeSyncYes—
Advanced OptimusNoNo
MUX switchYesYes
HDRYesNo
TouchscreenYesNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)64 GB96 GB
RAM (base)32 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,600 MHz5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM64 GB96 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)1,000 GB2,048 GB
SSD (base)1,000 GB512 GB
M.2 SSD slots21
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh75 Wh
Power adapter380 W240 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
USB-C charging power100 W100 W
Design & cooling
Weight2.8 kg2.4 kg
Thickness31 mm25.5 mm
Width354 mm359 mm
Depth268 mm262 mm
Body materialAluminium, PlasticPlastic
ColoursBlackBlack
Cooling fans32
Vapor chamber coolingYesNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)57.2 dB—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 5—
Thunderbolt or USB4YesNo
USB-C ports21
USB-A ports33
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet5 Gbit/s—
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.3
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadNoYes
Key travel1.7 mm1.7 mm
Webcam1,080p720p
IR camera (face login)YesNo
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers4 speakers2.0
Dolby AtmosYesNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare