Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024)
What ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (10) and where Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics9.6
9.7Overall performance9.7
9.6Display9.6
6.6Memory & storage8.6
3.1Battery & portability9.0
9.7Features & cooling9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024)
| ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) | Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 268 mm | 277.7 mm | −9.7 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357.7 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 31 mm | 22.7 mm | +8.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.5 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light29,079 vs 24,788+17%
- GPU compute (FP32)51.4 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS+14%
- Video memory24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024): No
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 9,728+8%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Legion 9i Gen 9 RTX 4090 (2024) better than ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.54 kg+10%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Thickness31 mm vs 22.7 mm+37%
- Liquid metal (CPU)No · ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- SD card readerNo · ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- USB-C ports2 vs 3+50%
- USB-C charging power100 W vs 140 W+40%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 236 ppi+25%
- Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5.8 GHz+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 51.4 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 29,079 | 24,788 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | — | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 19,717 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 3,232 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 1,888 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3200 × 2000 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,200 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 236 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 380 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.54 kg |
| Thickness | 31 mm | 22.7 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 357.7 mm |
| Depth | 268 mm | 277.7 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57.2 dB | 55.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)9.59.5
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.4
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.59.4
vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.6
vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)9.49.5
vs
Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634 RTX 4080 (2024)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5090 (2025)9.59.5

