Asus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026) vs Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)
What ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026) does better (4) and where Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Memory & storage2.7
Why is ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 2,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,406 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 24 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 23,356 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,484 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 2,626 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 168 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 380 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.5 kg | — |
| Thickness | 32 mm | — |
| Width | 399 mm | — |
| Depth | 294 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray, Green | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026)7.26.3vs
Asus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G814 RTX 5070 (2025)6.35.3vs
Asus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)6.36.9
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-I71 RTX 5080 (2026)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026)5.86.3vs
Asus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
MSI Vector 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5090 (2025)