Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)
What ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026) does better (11) and where ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Graphics9.1
9.3Overall performance9.0
9.4Display9.0
8.6Memory & storage8.0
3.8Battery & portability4.9
9.7Features & cooling9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)
| ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026) | ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 268 mm | 246 mm | +22 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 355 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 30.8 mm | 24.9 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- Refresh rate300 Hz vs 120 Hz2.5×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core2,576 vs 1,2832×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core22,730 vs 17,133+33%
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- Weight2.65 kg vs 2.82 kg+6%
- Upgradable RAMYes · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026): No
- CPU threads24 vs 16+50%
- Cooling fans3 vs 2+50%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Geekbench 6 single-core3,439 vs 2,952+16%
- Max CPU clock5.5 GHz vs 4.9 GHz+12%
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 RTX 5090 (2026) better than ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light15,679 vs 26,964+72%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 41.6 TFLOPS+59%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 135 W+17%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Thickness30.8 mm vs 24.9 mm+24%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- SD card readerNo · ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026): Yes
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 8,533 MHz+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 135 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 41.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 15,679 | 26,964 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 386H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 386H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 22,730 | 17,133 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,439 | 2,952 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 2,576 | 1,283 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 212 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 380 W | 250 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.65 kg | 2.82 kg |
| Thickness | 30.8 mm | 24.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 268 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Gray, Green | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 54.1 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)8.49.3vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)9.37.6vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5080 (2026)9.39.1vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)9.39.0vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026)9.39.3vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5090 (2026)9.39.4