Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) vs HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
What ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) does better (9) and where Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (29) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Graphics3.5
2.9Overall performance5.4
4.4Display8.4
2.7Memory & storage2.2
8.5Battery & portability5.2
4.7Features & cooling7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
| ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) | Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 204 mm | 234 mm | −30 mm |
| Width | 302 mm | 313 mm | −11 mm |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 18 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.8 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) better than Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight1.18 kg vs 1.75 kg+48%
- Thickness12 mm vs 18 mm+50%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Fan noise (max. load)41 dB vs 51.9 dB+27%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) better than ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)?
- GPU power (TGP)40 W vs 65 W+62%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light4,243 vs 7,977+88%
- GPU compute (FP32)6.1 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS+75%
- Battery capacity56 Wh vs 71 Wh+27%
- Video memory4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Geekbench 6 multi-core9,422 vs 12,402+32%
- Response time30 ms vs 0.2 ms150×
- CPU cores12 vs 16+33%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core725 vs 942+30%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 40 W | 65 W |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.1 TFLOPS | 10.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 4,243 | 7,977 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-12500H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 12 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-12500H, Core i7-12700H, Core i9-12900H | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,422 | 12,402 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,121 | 2,385 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 725 | 942 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13.4″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 30 ms | 0.2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 68% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 169 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,200 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 56 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 100 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.18 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 302 mm | 313 mm |
| Depth | 204 mm | 234 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 41 dB | 51.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsLenovo Legion 5 Gen 7 AMD RTX 3050 (2022)4.23.6
vs
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 RTX 3060 (2022)4.24.6
vs
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsLenovo Legion 5i 15 Gen 7 RTX 3060 (2022)4.24.5
vs
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsLenovo Legion 5 Pro Gen 7 AMD RTX 3050 Ti (2022)4.24.0
vs
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsLenovo Legion 5i 15 Gen 7 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)4.23.9
vs
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)vsLenovo Legion 5 Gen 7 AMD RTX 3050 Ti (2022)4.23.8

