Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Samsung Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)
What ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (18) and where Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Graphics6.1
9.6Overall performance7.5
7.8Display7.4
7.2Memory & storage8.8
9.4Battery & portability7.6
7.9Features & cooling7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)
| ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025) | Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 247 mm | 250.4 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 16.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 1.9 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)37.9 TFLOPS vs 15.6 TFLOPS2.4×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light24,718 vs 10,9652.3×
- GPU power (TGP)120 W vs 80 W+50%
- Video memory24 GB vs 8 GB3×
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 4,6082.3×
- Resolution class4K (2160p/2400p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 76 Wh+18%
- Response time0.2 ms vs 1 ms5×
- RAM (base)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 512 GB3.9×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023): No
- USB-A ports2 vs 12×
Why is Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023) better than ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- MUX switchNo · ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- CPU cores12 vs 16+33%
- Thickness17 mm vs 16.5 mm+3%
- Fan noise (max. load)53.2 dB vs 41.7 dB+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 120 W | 80 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 37.9 TFLOPS | 15.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 24,718 | 10,965 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 12 | 16 |
| CPU threads | — | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365, Ryzen AI 9 465 | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,748 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,450 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 972 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2400 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | 4K (2160p/2400p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 0.2 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 212 ppi | 212 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | No | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.85 kg | 1.86 kg |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 16.5 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355.4 mm |
| Depth | 247 mm | 250.4 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.2 dB | 41.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 5070 (2025)9.69.4vs
Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.69.6vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.69.6vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.69.5vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.69.4vs
Asus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5090 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.69.6