Alienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024) vs Asus Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)
What x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024) does better (22) and where Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics9.4
9.2Overall performance8.4
5.9Display8.5
6.9Memory & storage4.6
4.3Battery & portability6.4
9.6Features & cooling6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)
| x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024) | Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 289.8 mm | 251 mm | +38.8 mm |
| Width | 364.7 mm | 355 mm | +9.7 mm |
| Thickness | 18.6 mm | 17.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024) better than Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)?
- Refresh rate480 Hz vs 120 Hz4×
- GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 140 W+25%
- MUX switchYes · Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023): No
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+45%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light25,180 vs 19,370+30%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,420 vs 11,569+16%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 7,424+31%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- Cooling fans4 vs 22×
Why is Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023) better than x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Brightness300 nits vs 550 nits+83%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 96 Wh+7%
- Weight2.66 kg vs 2.4 kg+11%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- HDRNo · x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024): Yes
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,012 vs 1,092+8%
- Thickness18.6 mm vs 17.8 mm+4%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 236 ppi+66%
- Fan noise (max. load)53.9 dB vs 42 dB+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 25,180 | 19,370 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i7-12700H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i7-12700H, Core i7-13700H, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H, Core i9-13905H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,420 | 11,569 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,558 | 2,425 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,012 | 1,092 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 3200 × 2000 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 480 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 550 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 236 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | No |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 96 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.66 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 18.6 mm | 17.8 mm |
| Width | 364.7 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 289.8 mm | 251 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
| Cooling fans | 4 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.9 dB | 42 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| Ethernet port | No | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.4 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4080 (2024)vsAlienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)9.29.0
vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAlienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)9.29.0vs
Alienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4080 (2024)9.09.4vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4090 (2024)vsAlienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)9.39.0vsAlienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI Studio RTX 4070 (2024)9.09.0vs
Alienware x16 R2 RTX 4090 (2024)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2024)9.08.9