pan.tf
Compare
m16 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)

Alienware m16 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)

What m16 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (7) and where Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Alienware · 2023m16 RTX 4070 (2023)

8.7Score

7 advantages≈ $2,050

Higher score

Medion · 2022Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)

7.2Score

7 advantages≈ $2,150

9.2Memory & storage5.5

3.2Battery & portability8.8

9.6Features & cooling3.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

m16 RTX 4070 (2023)Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)

	m16 RTX 4070 (2023)	Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)	Difference
Depth	289.9 mm	262 mm	+27.9 mm
Width	368.9 mm	395 mm	−26.1 mm
Thickness	25.4 mm	26 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	3 kg	2.3 kg	+0.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is m16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)?

SSD (up to)8,192 GB vs 2,000 GB4.1×
Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022): No
CPU cores14 vs 8+75%
RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Thickness25.4 mm vs 26 mm+2%
Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+7%

Why is Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022) better than m16 RTX 4070 (2023)?

Video memory8 GB vs 64 GB8×
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Weight3 kg vs 2.3 kg+30%
Battery capacity86 Wh vs 91 Wh+6%
RAM (base)8 GB vs 64 GB8×
SSD (base)256 GB vs 2,000 GB7.8×
Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Alienware m16 RTX 4070 (2023)≈ $2,0508.7	Medion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)≈ $2,1507.2
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop	GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	115 W	—
Video memory	8 GB	64 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	—
GPU shader cores	4,608	—
GPU compute (FP32)	20 TFLOPS	—
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	14,900	—
Processor
Processor	Core i7-13650HX	Ryzen 9 5900HX
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	14	8
CPU threads	20	—
Max CPU clock	4.9 GHz	4.6 GHz
Processor options	Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7845HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX	—
Geekbench 6 multi-core	14,664	—
Geekbench 6 single-core	2,818	—
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	1,136	—
Display
Screen size	16″	17.3″
Resolution	1920 × 1200	2560 × 1440
Resolution class	Full HD (1080p/1200p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	480 Hz	—
Panel type	IPS	—
Brightness	300 nits	—
Response time	3 ms	—
DCI-P3 coverage	100%	—
Pixel density	142 ppi	—
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:9
G-Sync / FreeSync	Yes	—
Advanced Optimus	No	—
MUX switch	Yes	—
HDR	Yes	—
Touchscreen	No	—
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	64 GB	64 GB
RAM (base)	8 GB	64 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR4
RAM speed	4,800 MHz	—
Max. supported RAM	64 GB	—
RAM slots	2	—
Upgradable RAM	Yes	—
SSD (up to)	8,192 GB	2,000 GB
SSD (base)	256 GB	2,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	2	—
SSD interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	—
Battery & power
Battery capacity	86 Wh	91 Wh
Power adapter	330 W	—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	Yes	—
Design & cooling
Weight	3 kg	2.3 kg
Thickness	25.4 mm	26 mm
Width	368.9 mm	395 mm
Depth	289.9 mm	262 mm
Body material	Aluminium	—
Colours	Gray	Black
Cooling fans	4	—
Vapor chamber cooling	Yes	—
Liquid metal (CPU)	Yes	—
Fan noise (max. load)	54.7 dB	—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	—
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	No
USB-C ports	2	—
USB-A ports	2	—
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	Yes	—
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	—
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	Yes	Yes
Numeric keypad	No	—
Key travel	1.8 mm	—
Webcam	1,080p	—
Fingerprint reader	No	—
Audio
Speakers	2.0	—
Dolby Atmos	Yes	—