Alienware 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)
What 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (12) and where ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Graphics8.9
5.9Overall performance9.0
7.5Display9.8
9.1Memory & storage4.5
7.5Battery & portability2.7
9.7Features & cooling7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)
| 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 290 mm | 298 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 365 mm | 399 mm | −34 mm |
| Thickness | 28.5 mm | 32 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Weight | 3.2 kg | 3.3 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)12,288 GB vs 4,000 GB3.1×
- RAM (up to)96 GB vs 64 GB+50%
- Battery capacity96 Wh vs 90 Wh+7%
- Weight3.15 kg vs 3.3 kg+5%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Webcam2,160p vs 1,080p2×
- Thickness28.5 mm vs 32 mm+12%
- Max. supported RAM96 GB vs 64 GB+50%
- M.2 SSD slots3 vs 2+50%
- Cooling fans4 vs 3+33%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
Why is ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) better than 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Brightness500 nits vs 1,200 nits2.4×
- Video memory12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- GPU compute (FP32)37.4 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+37%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light21,921 vs 30,125+37%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 10,496+78%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)No · 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- CPU cores20 vs 24+20%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 5.5 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 37.4 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 21,921 | 30,125 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,606 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,197 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,945 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3840 × 2400 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 4K (2160p/2400p) |
| Refresh rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 96% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 168 ppi | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 96 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 96 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 12,288 GB | 4,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 3 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 96 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 360 W | 380 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.15 kg | 3.3 kg |
| Thickness | 28.5 mm | 32 mm |
| Width | 365 mm | 399 mm |
| Depth | 290 mm | 298 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Green | Black |
| Cooling fans | 4 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.9 dB | 53.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 2,160p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.2 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Alienware 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)8.68.6vs
Alienware 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW RTX 5080 (2025)8.68.3vs
Alienware 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Alienware 18 Area-51 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5080 (2025)8.68.7
vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 9 18 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)9.08.9