vs
8.3Battery & portability3.5
9.3Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025)Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025) | Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 265 mm | 269 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm | = |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 30 mm | −7 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thickness23 mm vs 30 mm+30%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Weight2.61 kg vs 2.37 kg+10%
- SD card readerNo · Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | — |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 15,404 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | — |
| CPU maker | Intel | — |
| CPU cores | 24 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | — |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | — |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | — |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | — |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | — |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 96 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | — |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | — |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 96 Wh | — |
| Power adapter | 280 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.61 kg | 2.37 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 265 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Magnesium alloy | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 58 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Alienware Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Alienware Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.09.2vs
Alienware Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.08.8vs
Alienware Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Fusion 15 RTX 5070 (2025)9.09.2vs
Alienware Aurora 16X RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3XW RTX 5070 (2025)9.08.9
vs
MSI Crosshair 15 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.66.7