Alienware 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Memory & storage2.6
Why is 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 300 Hz2.5×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 5,8882.3×
- Video memory6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Battery capacity96 Wh vs 99 Wh+3%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 8.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 6,726 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Core 7 240H, Core 9 270H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,457 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,584 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 609 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 71% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 96 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.49 kg | — |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 265.4 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Magnesium alloy | — |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.6 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Alienware 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 B13 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.5
vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAlienware 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025)6.36.4vs
Alienware 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Alienware 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.4vs
Alienware 16 Aurora RTX 4050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.3
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)