Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) vs MSI Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (9) and where Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Graphics8.0
7.8Overall performance8.7
7.1Display4.8
8.0Memory & storage8.6
9.2Battery & portability9.4
8.8Features & cooling7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) | Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 267 mm | −17.8 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 358 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23.4 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Weight2.05 kg vs 2.4 kg+17%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- Advanced OptimusYes · Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 23.4 mm+12%
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+33%
- Fan noise (max. load)51 dB vs 59.7 dB+17%
Why is Vector GP68 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 100 Wh+31%
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 140 W+27%
- GPU compute (FP32)18.2 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+20%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,581 vs 14,930+19%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,420 vs 13,690+10%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core979 vs 1,334+36%
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- USB-C ports2 vs 3+50%
- CPU threads22 vs 24+9%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,465 vs 2,652+8%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5 GHz+4%
- Pixel density138 ppi vs 142 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.2 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,420 | 13,690 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i9-12900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i7-13700H, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-12900HX, Core i9-13950HX, Core i9-13980HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | 14,930 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | 2,652 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | 1,334 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 62% |
| Response time | — | 10 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 45% |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23.4 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 358 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 267 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Silver | Black, Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | 59.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 3 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.78.9vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.78.3vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)8.76.6vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 15X RTX 4060 (2023)8.78.7vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 RTX 4060 (2023)8.78.7vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.78.6