- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (21) and where Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Graphics4.6
7.8Overall performance6.3
7.1Display7.3
8.0Memory & storage6.6
9.2Battery & portability8.5
8.8Features & cooling8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) | Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 230 mm | +19.2 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 323 mm | +33 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 22 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 80 W+38%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 58 Wh+31%
- GPU compute (FP32)18.2 TFLOPS vs 11.6 TFLOPS+57%
- MUX switchYes · Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,420 vs 9,207+35%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,581 vs 12,271+3%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core979 vs 785+25%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023): No
Why is Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Brightness400 nits vs 600 nits+50%
- Weight2.05 kg vs 1.98 kg+4%
- HDRNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Pixel density138 ppi vs 200 ppi+45%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,465 vs 2,612+6%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 80 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.2 TFLOPS | 11.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,420 | 9,207 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i7-13700H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i7-13700H, Core i7-13800H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | 12,271 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | 2,612 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | 785 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14.4″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2400 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 67% |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 200 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 3:2 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | No |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 7,500 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | No | No |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 58 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 22 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 323 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 230 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Silver | Silver |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | 51.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | 1.3 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.78.9vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.78.3vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.78.6vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 15X RTX 4060 (2023)8.78.7vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 RTX 4060 (2023)8.78.7
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)vsMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 (2023)7.47.4