pan.tf
Compare
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)

What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (4) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Acer · 2024Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)

6.6Score

4 advantages≈ $2,150

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)

Asus · 2024TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)

7.9Score

8 advantages≈ $2,050

Higher score

2.3Memory & storage3.2

9.3Battery & portability8.9

8.4Features & cooling7.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)

	Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)	TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)	Difference
Depth	250 mm	269 mm	−19 mm
Width	356 mm	354 mm	+2 mm
Thickness	21 mm	26 mm	−5 mm
Weight	2.1 kg	2.2 kg	−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)?

Weight2.1 kg vs 2.2 kg+5%
Thickness21 mm vs 26 mm+24%
SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024): No
CPU cores14 vs 12+17%

Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)?

Resolution classHD (768p/900p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+13%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)≈ $2,1506.6	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)≈ $2,0507.9
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop	GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	140 W
Video memory	6 GB	8 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	2,560	4,608
GPU compute (FP32)	—	21.8 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	13,427
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 5 125H	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	14	12
Max CPU clock	4.5 GHz	5.1 GHz
Processor options	—	Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX
Display
Screen size	16″	16″
Resolution	1600 × 900	2560 × 1600
Resolution class	HD (768p/900p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	—	165 Hz
Panel type	—	IPS
Brightness	—	250 nits
sRGB coverage	—	100%
Response time	—	3 ms
DCI-P3 coverage	—	40%
Pixel density	—	142 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	Yes
Advanced Optimus	—	No
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	16 GB	16 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	16 GB
RAM type	DDR5	LPDDR5X
RAM speed	—	7,500 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	32 GB
RAM slots	—	2
Upgradable RAM	—	Yes
SSD (up to)	512 GB	1,000 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	1,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	76 Wh	90 Wh
Power adapter	230 W	240 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
USB-C charging power	—	100 W
Design & cooling
Weight	2.1 kg	2.2 kg
Thickness	21 mm	26 mm
Width	356 mm	354 mm
Depth	250 mm	269 mm
Body material	—	Aluminium, Plastic
Colours	—	Black
Cooling fans	—	2
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Fan noise (max. load)	—	39.4 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	Yes
USB-C ports	—	2
USB-A ports	—	2
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	Yes	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	Yes
Key travel	—	1.7 mm
Webcam	1,080p	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	—	No
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	—	Yes