- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) vs ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (11) and where ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023) wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Graphics9.1
6.5Overall performance8.6
7.1Display9.3
8.0Memory & storage7.1
9.2Battery & portability9.2
8.8Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 246 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 355 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Weight2.05 kg vs 2.3 kg+12%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core979 vs 754+30%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- CPU cores16 vs 14+14%
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 23 mm+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+56%
- Fan noise (max. load)51 dB vs 57.5 dB+13%
- CPU threads22 vs 20+10%
Why is ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)12.1 TFLOPS vs 33.9 TFLOPS2.8×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,896 vs 21,0902.7×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 7,4242.9×
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 150 W+36%
- Video memory6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,581 vs 15,617+24%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 150 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.1 TFLOPS | 33.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,896 | 21,090 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i9-13900H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | 15,617 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | 2,821 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | 754 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | 57.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)9.49.2vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.2
vsAcer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)9.69.4vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.6vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.4