Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (12) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Graphics7.5
6.5Overall performance7.8
7.1Display7.3
8.0Memory & storage6.6
9.2Battery & portability9.7
8.8Features & cooling8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 243 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 355 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 22.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 48 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,581 vs 11,550+9%
- RAM speed7,467 MHz vs 3,200 MHz2.3×
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR4
- CPU cores16 vs 14+14%
- Thickness20.8 mm vs 22.3 mm+7%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)51 dB vs 60 dB+18%
- CPU threads22 vs 20+10%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.7 GHz+2%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,896 vs 13,958+77%
- GPU compute (FP32)12.1 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS+65%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- GPU power (TGP)110 W vs 120 W+9%
- Weight2.05 kg vs 2 kg+2%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- HDRNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core979 vs 1,091+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 110 W | 120 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.1 TFLOPS | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,896 | 13,958 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i7-12700H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 7 165H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i7-12700H, Core i7-13620H, Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,581 | 11,550 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,465 | 2,458 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 979 | 1,091 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 74% |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 48 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 48 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 1 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 2 kg |
| Thickness | 20.8 mm | 22.3 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 249.2 mm | 243 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Silver | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | 60 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.7vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.7vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.6vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F15 TUF507 RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.7
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.78.3
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.98.7