Acer Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)
What Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) does better (12) and where Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Graphics4.2
2.1Overall performance2.6
3.7Display5.7
2.9Memory & storage2.8
4.8Battery & portability3.0
3.0Features & cooling3.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)
| Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) | Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 228 mm | 235 mm | −7 mm |
| Width | 323 mm | 355 mm | −32 mm |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 20 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.1 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) better than Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021): No
- GPU power (TGP)75 W vs 70 W+7%
- Weight1.7 kg vs 2.1 kg+24%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021): No
- Thickness17.9 mm vs 20 mm+12%
- Brightness330 nits vs 300 nits+10%
- SSD (up to)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
- Pixel density157 ppi vs 141 ppi+11%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+4%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 97%+3%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021) better than Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Battery capacity60 Wh vs 80 Wh+33%
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU compute (FP32)8.2 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS+30%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light5,441 vs 6,958+28%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,840+50%
- USB-A ports1 vs 33×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 75 W | 70 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,840 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 8.2 TFLOPS | 10.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,441 | 6,958 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-11370H | Core i7-11800H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 8 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-11370H | Core i7-10875H, Core i7-11800H, Core i7-12800H, Core i9-11900H, Core i9-12900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 6,056 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 1,781 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 276 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 330 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 97% |
| Response time | — | 2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 77% | — |
| Pixel density | 157 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 3,200 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 1 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 60 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 20 mm |
| Width | 323 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 228 mm | 235 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Silver | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.6 dB | 51.6 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.3 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)vsRazer Blade 15 Base Edition RTX 3060 (2021)3.83.8vs
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)vsAsus ROG Flow X13 GV301 RTX 3050 Ti (2021)3.83.8vsAcer Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)vsAsus ROG Flow X13 GV301 RTX 3050 (2021)3.83.7vs
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301 RTX 3050 (2021)vsRazer Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)3.74.1
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 3050 Ti (2021)vsRazer Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)4.54.1vsAcer Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3060 (2021)vsRazer Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)3.94.1