NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) vs Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021)

Acer Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) vs Razer Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021)

What Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) does better (8) and where Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021) wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Acer Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)
3.8Score
8 advantages
vs
Razer Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021)
4.1Score
18 advantages
Higher score
2.6Graphics4.3
2.1Overall performance3.2
3.7Display3.1
2.9Memory & storage2.2
4.8Battery & portability5.8
3.0Features & cooling2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021)
323 × 22817.9319.7 × 22016.8
Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021)Difference
Depth228 mm220 mm+8 mm
Width323 mm319.7 mm+3.3 mm
Thickness17.9 mm16.8 mm+1.1 mm
Weight1.7 kg1.8 kg−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021) better than Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021)?

  1. RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  2. MUX switchYes · Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021): No
  3. Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021): No
  4. Weight1.7 kg vs 1.78 kg+5%
  5. Upgradable RAMYes · Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021): No
  6. Brightness330 nits vs 300 nits+10%
  7. Key travel1.3 mm vs 1.1 mm+18%
  8. Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+4%

Why is Blade 14 RTX 3060 (2021) better than Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021)?

  1. Cinebench 2024 multi-core276 vs 6912.5×
  2. GPU power (TGP)75 W vs 100 W+33%
  3. GPU compute (FP32)8.2 TFLOPS vs 12.3 TFLOPS+50%
  4. CPU cores4 vs 82×
  5. Geekbench 6 multi-core6,056 vs 8,555+41%
  6. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light5,441 vs 7,684+41%
  7. Battery capacity60 Wh vs 62 Wh+3%
  8. GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,840+50%
  9. CPU threads8 vs 162×
  10. RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  11. Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Triton 300 SE RTX 3050 Ti (2021): Yes
  12. USB-C ports1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 3050 Ti LaptopGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)75 W100 W
Video memory6 GB6 GB
Video memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
GPU shader cores2,5603,840
GPU compute (FP32)8.2 TFLOPS12.3 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light5,4417,684
Processor
ProcessorCore i7-11370HRyzen 9 5900HX
CPU makerIntelAMD
CPU cores48
CPU threads816
Max CPU clock4.8 GHz4.6 GHz
Processor optionsCore i7-11370HRyzen 9 5900HX
Geekbench 6 multi-core6,0568,555
Geekbench 6 single-core1,7812,019
Cinebench 2024 multi-core276691
Display
Screen size14″14″
Resolution1920 × 10801920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness330 nits300 nits
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage77%—
Pixel density157 ppi157 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesYes
Advanced OptimusNoNo
MUX switchYesNo
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB16 GB
RAM (base)8 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR4DDR4
RAM speed3,200 MHz3,200 MHz
Max. supported RAM32 GB—
RAM slots1—
Upgradable RAMYesNo
SSD (up to)1,024 GB1,024 GB
SSD (base)1,024 GB1,024 GB
M.2 SSD slots11
SSD interfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity60 Wh62 Wh
Power adapter180 W230 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
Design & cooling
Weight1.7 kg1.78 kg
Thickness17.9 mm16.8 mm
Width323 mm319.7 mm
Depth228 mm220 mm
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
ColoursSilverBlack
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoYes
Fan noise (max. load)62.6 dB52 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4—
Thunderbolt or USB4YesNo
USB-C ports12
USB-A ports12
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet portNoNo
SD card readerNoNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth55.2
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadNoNo
Key travel1.3 mm1.1 mm
Webcam720p720p
IR camera (face login)NoYes
Fingerprint readerYesNo
Audio
Speakers2.02.0
Dolby AtmosYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare